@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@ |
||
| 1 |
+# HealthProbe Development Log |
|
| 2 |
+ |
|
| 3 |
+**Canonical path:** `HealthProbe/Doc/04-project/Development-Log.md` |
|
| 4 |
+**Created:** 2026-06-06 |
|
| 5 |
+**Purpose:** Preserve project context that affects decisions across agent sessions. |
|
| 6 |
+ |
|
| 7 |
+This is the project memory log. Use it for facts that explain why HealthProbe is |
|
| 8 |
+being built, why a device or dataset matters, and what historical context should |
|
| 9 |
+not be rediscovered repeatedly from chat history. |
|
| 10 |
+ |
|
| 11 |
+Use specialized documents for detailed technical evidence: |
|
| 12 |
+- import timings and performance experiments: `Import-Optimization-Log.md`; |
|
| 13 |
+- refactoring milestones: `Refactoring-Plan.md`; |
|
| 14 |
+- current implementation status: `IMPLEMENTATION_STATUS.md`; |
|
| 15 |
+- product scope and non-goals: `../01-product/Product-Specification.md`. |
|
| 16 |
+ |
|
| 17 |
+## Maintenance Rules |
|
| 18 |
+ |
|
| 19 |
+1. Add dated entries when context changes or when an old assumption is recovered. |
|
| 20 |
+2. Keep entries factual and decision-relevant. |
|
| 21 |
+3. Link or summarize supporting reports instead of pasting large diagnostics. |
|
| 22 |
+4. If a fact belongs in product scope, update product docs too. |
|
| 23 |
+5. If a fact belongs in performance analysis, update `Import-Optimization-Log.md` |
|
| 24 |
+ too. |
|
| 25 |
+ |
|
| 26 |
+## Device And Dataset Context |
|
| 27 |
+ |
|
| 28 |
+### 2026-06-06 - Restored Pre-Loss Reference Device |
|
| 29 |
+ |
|
| 30 |
+The large-database test device is a restored copy of the user's Health database |
|
| 31 |
+from before the data-loss event noticed later on the iPhone 16. It is not the |
|
| 32 |
+untouched original device state. |
|
| 33 |
+ |
|
| 34 |
+Important properties: |
|
| 35 |
+- the source backup still exists and can be restored again if needed; |
|
| 36 |
+- the restored device has already been used for attempts to restart or force |
|
| 37 |
+ natural iCloud Health synchronization; |
|
| 38 |
+- results from this device should be labelled as coming from a restored |
|
| 39 |
+ pre-loss-reference copy; |
|
| 40 |
+- the device can be used for aggressive experiments when necessary, because it |
|
| 41 |
+ is not the only copy of that state; |
|
| 42 |
+- it remains a crucial reference dataset for future two-database comparison work. |
|
| 43 |
+ |
|
| 44 |
+Why this matters: |
|
| 45 |
+- HealthProbe exists partly because this kind of Health database state can become |
|
| 46 |
+ inconsistent across devices and over time; |
|
| 47 |
+- the app must distinguish Health UI visibility, HealthKit availability, |
|
| 48 |
+ synchronization state, and HealthProbe archive state; |
|
| 49 |
+- future multi-archive comparison should compare this restored pre-loss reference |
|
| 50 |
+ against the current iPhone 16 archive without assuming record-by-record |
|
| 51 |
+ cross-device identity. |
|
| 52 |
+ |
|
| 53 |
+### 2026-06-06 - Blood Pressure Access Changed On Restored Device |
|
| 54 |
+ |
|
| 55 |
+A complete first import from 2026-06-04 on the restored reference device included |
|
| 56 |
+Blood Pressure Systolic and Diastolic: |
|
| 57 |
+- both were `authorizationStatus: granted`; |
|
| 58 |
+- both imported `5,120` samples; |
|
| 59 |
+- both ranged from `2014-12-18T11:24:11Z` to `2026-05-29T03:06:36Z`. |
|
| 60 |
+ |
|
| 61 |
+A later retry on 2026-06-06 from the same device reported both Blood Pressure |
|
| 62 |
+types as unavailable because HealthKit returned `Authorization not determined` |
|
| 63 |
+for earliest/latest queries. |
|
| 64 |
+ |
|
| 65 |
+Interpretation: |
|
| 66 |
+- this is evidence of a device / iOS HealthKit authorization or Health database |
|
| 67 |
+ state change; |
|
| 68 |
+- it is not evidence that HealthProbe cannot import Blood Pressure; |
|
| 69 |
+- future runs should preserve these reports as before/after context. |
|
| 70 |
+ |
|
| 71 |
+## Product Direction Context |
|
| 72 |
+ |
|
| 73 |
+### 2026-05 to 2026-06 - Why Full Authorized Backup Matters |
|
| 74 |
+ |
|
| 75 |
+The original 15-type capture profile is only a v1/test subset. It is not enough |
|
| 76 |
+to validate the database or import architecture because the real target is full |
|
| 77 |
+authorized backup of the local HealthKit-accessible database. |
|
| 78 |
+ |
|
| 79 |
+Reason: |
|
| 80 |
+- assumptions that hold on a small Health subset may fail on full profile volume; |
|
| 81 |
+- Apple Health may aggregate, prune, stop syncing, or expose different data |
|
| 82 |
+ through UI versus HealthKit; |
|
| 83 |
+- recovery-compatible exports need complete-enough source data, not just summary |
|
| 84 |
+ counts. |
|
| 85 |
+ |
|
| 86 |
+Implementation consequence: |
|
| 87 |
+- SQLite remains the source of truth; |
|
| 88 |
+- SwiftData must not be expanded; |
|
| 89 |
+- import, storage, and export decisions should be validated against full-profile |
|
| 90 |
+ datasets where possible. |
|
| 91 |
+ |
|
| 92 |
+## Open Context Questions |
|
| 93 |
+ |
|
| 94 |
+- How should HealthProbe label a metric that is visible in Apple Health UI but |
|
| 95 |
+ returns `Authorization not determined` or another HealthKit access failure? |
|
| 96 |
+- When two local archives exist for different devices or restored states, what |
|
| 97 |
+ comparison mode is useful without reviving the old record-by-record |
|
| 98 |
+ cross-device objective? |
|
| 99 |
+- Which diagnostic fields should be retained inside the archive so old reports |
|
| 100 |
+ can be reconstructed without depending on copied text? |
|
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ Use the chapter map below. Send agents to the narrowest document that matches th |
||
| 37 | 37 |
| General agent ownership and handoff rules | [`00-agent-guides/AGENTS.md`](00-agent-guides/AGENTS.md) | |
| 38 | 38 |
| SwiftUI/UI work | [`00-agent-guides/CLAUDE.md`](00-agent-guides/CLAUDE.md) | |
| 39 | 39 |
| Refactoring milestones and sequencing | [`04-project/Refactoring-Plan.md`](04-project/Refactoring-Plan.md) | |
| 40 |
+| Project memory, recovered context, reference devices/datasets | [`04-project/Development-Log.md`](04-project/Development-Log.md) | |
|
| 40 | 41 |
| Import performance iterations and real-device timing comparisons | [`04-project/Import-Optimization-Log.md`](04-project/Import-Optimization-Log.md) | |
| 41 | 42 |
| Project status and refactoring priorities | [`04-project/IMPLEMENTATION_STATUS.md`](04-project/IMPLEMENTATION_STATUS.md) | |
| 42 | 43 |
| SwiftData retirement inventory | [`04-project/SwiftData-Retirement-Inventory.md`](04-project/SwiftData-Retirement-Inventory.md) | |
@@ -87,6 +88,10 @@ Use the chapter map below. Send agents to the narrowest document that matches th |
||
| 87 | 88 |
- [`04-project/Refactoring-Plan.md`](04-project/Refactoring-Plan.md) |
| 88 | 89 |
Checkable milestone plan for the database-led refactor from prototype architecture to SQLite archive v2 + Core Data cache. |
| 89 | 90 |
|
| 91 |
+- [`04-project/Development-Log.md`](04-project/Development-Log.md) |
|
| 92 |
+ Project memory log for recovered context, reference devices/datasets, and |
|
| 93 |
+ decision-relevant history that should survive agent handoffs. |
|
| 94 |
+ |
|
| 90 | 95 |
- [`04-project/Import-Optimization-Log.md`](04-project/Import-Optimization-Log.md) |
| 91 | 96 |
Living log for first-import optimization work, measured real-device reports, bottleneck diagnosis, and next experiments. |
| 92 | 97 |
|